Pages

Thursday 3 February 2011

The Formation Forum - Chelsea Plus Torres: Diamonds Are...For...Now?

By Si Warner

When Nicolas Anelka signed for Chelsea, the phrase ‘square peg in round hole‘ sprung to mind. "How will he play with Drogba?" gasped the faithful.


Chelsea had stubbornly won 2 titles with a rigid 4-3-3 formation under Mourinho. Avram Grant inherited a team that, in his Santa guise, Roman Abramovich had delivered Anelka as a late Christmas present. Le Sulk often played second fiddle to Le Drog during Grant’s brief reign.

Enter Guus Hiddink under whom Anelka was introduced on the wing where he remained until Carlo Ancelotti arrived. He immediately acknowledged that these "front 2" needed to play as a "front 2".

The diamond formation was perceived to be the solution and it seemed just perfect: Lampard would devour the free role behind the "front 2". Ballack, Essien and Mikel would excel in the midfield triangle (remember Malouda was not very good then). Bosingwa and Cole would revel in the freedom to roam forward and provide width.

It never quite worked to plan though.

Lampard, in particular, was stifled without making his runs from deep and not able to dictate play. A mere 20 games in, Carlo reverted back to 4-3-3.

Anelka moved wide again with formidable yet contrasting returns: the domestic double compensating for a harsh Champions League exit. The formation has existed ever since with Carlo pretty much refusing to alter his plans even when chasing a game.

Now comes the big conundrum: Where does El Nino fit in?

Ideally all three form the deadliest strike-force the Premier league has ever witnessed. However, neither Didier or Fernando have ever drifted from a central striking role (as far as I am aware). Does the tobacco stained Italian tactician revert to a "front 2" and drop Anelka - The same Anelka that was so exquisite at Sunderland this week? How on earth does Malouda fit in to all of this?

Ordinarily, I feel I am pretty nifty at predicting line-ups but, hand on heart, I can honestly say I am simply stumped on this one. Torres will likely be on the bench this weekend and he will accept that. But not for long.

 So how do Chelsea accommodate their new £50m man?

7 comments:

jamsiep said...

4-4-2 diamond

Cech
Ivanovic Luiz Terry Cole
Essien
Ramires Lampard
Anelka
Drogba Torres

Sorted!

The Stock said...

Ramires instead of Mikel?

I know he looks like he's starting to settle, but no brainer as far as i'm concerned.

Si said...

Not sure, James. Not sure. Anelka at the tip of the diamond had never crossed my mind. Could be a master-stroke though. Reckon Malouda is slipping out of favour?

Johnny Unitas said...

Spot on from the Priest, I think Ramires will be Malouda though in that predicted line up, you can't drop Malouda.

The Stock said...

I would agree. I do think you can drop Anelka though if he has another existential sojourn to the wilderness.

jamsiep said...

Anelka played that role against Sunderland, in behind Drogba and Kalou, and was superb, so I'd imagine that he'll play there again.

Ramires has been our best player, IMO, for a month or so now, whereas Mikel's form has dropped considerably since the beginning of the season - and he's been responsible for a few goals that we've conceded.

Not sure who will be the forward two for the Liverpool game though. It will be two from Drogba, Kalou and Torres, and I have no idea which two. It could easily be every possible combo.

I wrote something about it all prior to the Sunderland game:

http://youngsportswriters.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/ancelotti-returning-to-a-midfield-diamond/

Although on the evidence of the Sunderland game, it will be Anelka at the tip, not Malouda.

Si said...

I reckon you have nailed that one then, James. I still expect Mikel to hold with Essien and Lamps in front. Will be delighted if Luiz plays and Bosingwa is dropped to the bench.

Post a Comment